Compare phones
Motorola Moto E (2015)
XT1527XT1527
| Global Score | |
| 63.5 | 69.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-02-25 | 2019-03-20 |
| 5.11 x 2.63 x 0.48 inches | 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 290.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 245 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 11.36 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 8.58 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2390mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K40 is much better than the Moto E (2015), having a general score of 69.8 against 63.5. LG K40's construction has the same weight than the Moto E (2015), but it is incredibly thinner. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG K40 has a more recent 8.1 Oreo version while Moto E (2015) has Android 5.0.
The Moto E (2015) and the LG K40 count with incredibly similar CPUs, because although the LG K40 has a 32-bits processing unit instead of 64-bits and doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Moto E (2015) features a bit more vivid screen than LG K40, although it has a lot smaller screen, a quite worse pixels density and a way lower 960 x 540 resolution.
LG K40 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Moto E (2015), because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 16 GB internal storage capacity. LG K40 captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Moto E (2015), because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low-light situations, a much more mega pixels camera and a way better 1920x1080 video resolution.
LG K40 features better battery life than Moto E (2015), because it has a 26 percent larger battery size.
LG K40 not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.