Compare phones
Motorola Moto E (2015)
XT1527XT1527
| Global Score | |
| 63.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-02-25 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.11 x 2.63 x 0.48 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 290.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 245 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2390mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is way better than Moto E (2015), getting an 89.7 score against 63.5. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite body is extremely newer and incredibly thinner than the Moto E (2015)'s, but it is also incredibly heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto E (2015), because although it has a 32-bit processor instead of 64-bits and doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and 7 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little more vivid display than Moto E (2015), because it has a really larger display, a much better pixels density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a way better camera than Moto E (2015), because it has a lot better video resolution, a camera in the back with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Moto E (2015), because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a much better battery performance than Moto E (2015), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2390mAh.
The Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.