Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.29 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Champagne pink and Midnight blue | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is much better than the Moto E (2020)'s general score of 69.7. Google Pixel 2 XL's body is a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Moto E (2020), although it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit superior processing unit than Moto E (2020), and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a lot better display than Moto E (2020), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher screen density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto E (2020), because although it has a camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto E (2020), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 2 XL's battery duration is very similar to the Moto E (2020) one, although the Google Pixel 2 XL has 3520mAh of battery capacity instead of 3550mAh.
The Google Pixel 2 XL costs a bit more than Moto E (2020), but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.