Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.29 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Champagne pink and Midnight blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A6 is a little bit better than Moto E (2020), with a global score of 75.8 against 69.7. The Samsung Galaxy A6 is an a lot older phone than the Moto E (2020), but Samsung made it somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. The Galaxy A6 has a bit more vivid display than Moto E (2020), because although it has a little lower resolution of 720 x 1480px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better display pixel density.
The Motorola Moto E (2020) counts with slightly more memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto E (2020) also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Moto E (2020) has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A6, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A6 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Moto E (2020), because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A6 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality, a more MP camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations.
The Moto E (2020) counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has an 18 percent greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A6 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.