Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.7 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2020-06-12 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.29 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Champagne pink and Midnight blue | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 5.52 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S4 is just a bit better than the Moto E (2020), with a 76.1 score against 69.7. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Galaxy S4 has the newer 4.4.2 version while Moto E (2020) has Android 10, so it gives some extra features and improved performance. Galaxy S4's design is a lot lighter and just a little thinner than Moto E (2020), although it was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy S4 features a much more vibrant screen than Moto E (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1920 x 1080px resolution and a lot greater screen density. Moto E (2020) has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S4, because it has 32 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S4 counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto E (2020), because although it has lesser cores , and they both have 2 GB of RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy S4 also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Moto E (2020) has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has a 3550mAh battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
The Motorola Moto E (2020) captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S4, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality photos, and they both have a 13 MP resolution back facing camera and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Motorola Moto E (2020) also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S4 is also cheaper than the Moto E (2020).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.