Compare phones
Motorola Moto E
Dual Sim| Global Score | |
| 56.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-05-13 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.91 x 2.55 x 0.48 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1980mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a score of 80.7, which is much better than Moto E's 56.9 score. The Google Pixel 3 XL construction is much newer and a lot thinner than the Moto E's, although it's also notably heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL features a better display than Moto E, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution, a lot larger screen and a lot better screen pixels density.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a better performing processor than Moto E, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 6 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 3 XL shoots way better videos and photos than Motorola Moto E, because it has a way better resolution back facing camera.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto E, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 3 XL has a superior battery life than Moto E, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity against 1980mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 XL is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.