Compare phones
Motorola Moto E
Dual Sim| Global Score | |
| 56.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-05-13 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.91 x 2.55 x 0.48 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1980mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a lot better than the Motorola Moto E, with a global score of 83.8 against 56.9. Even though Samsung Galaxy A50 is somewhat heavier than the Motorola Moto E, it's a lot thinner and also extremely newer. Galaxy A50 has a quite superior hardware performance than Moto E, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better display than Moto E, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a way better pixel density and a much bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A50 takes much better videos and photos than Moto E, because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher 25 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A50 features a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto E, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A50 counts with a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto E, because it has a 102% larger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a little more than the Moto E, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.