Compare phones
Motorola Moto E
Dual SimSamsung Galaxy Ace 3
3G Only Dual SIMGT-S7272
| Global Score | |
| 56.9 | 60.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2 | Android 4.2.2 |
| 2014-05-13 | 2013-06-10 |
| 4.91 x 2.55 x 0.48 inches | 4.77 x 2.47 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 200.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 256 pixels per inch | 233 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset | Broadcom BCM21664 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Broadcom VideoCore IV (250 MHz) GPU |
| 8.1 | 7.83 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 4.26 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 6.71 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and GSM |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.7 | 5.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1980mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 8 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Ace 3 has a global score of 60.8, which is a little bit better than Moto E's overall score of 56.9. The Galaxy Ace 3 body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto E, despite of the fact that it was released just 11 months before. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Ace 3 has older 4.2.2 version and Moto E has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Moto E has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy Ace 3, and although they both have a Dual-Core CPU and a 1 GB RAM memory, the Motorola Moto E also has a much better 400 MHz graphics processing unit. The Moto E counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has a bit higher resolution of 960 x 540, a little larger screen and a little bit greater pixel number in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy Ace 3 has a way better camera than Motorola Moto E. Both of them have a same resolution back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto E, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 64 GB.
Moto E counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Ace 3, because it has 1980mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy Ace 3 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.