Compare phones
Motorola Moto E
for America| Global Score | |
| 56.9 | 62.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-05-13 | 2020-10-19 |
| 4.91 x 2.55 x 0.48 inches | 5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 105.00 | $ 89.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset | MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8300 GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1980mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 2 V Tella is a bit better than Moto E, having a score of 62.1 against 56.9. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 2 V Tella has the previous 10 version while Moto E has Android 4.4.4. Even though Nokia 2 V Tella is a lot heavier than Moto E, it's way thinner and also way newer.
Nokia 2 V Tella has a little better performance than Motorola Moto E, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster) and more RAM memory. Motorola Moto E has just a bit better looking display than Nokia 2 V Tella, although it has a way smaller screen, a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a way worse resolution of 960 x 540px.
Nokia 2 V Tella has a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto E, because it has 12 GB more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 128 GB. Nokia 2 V Tella captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto E, because it has a lot better 8 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Nokia 2 V Tella has a superior battery lifetime than Moto E, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
The Nokia 2 V Tella not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.