Global Score | |
56.9 | 70.8 |
Basic Information | |
Motorola | Samsung |
Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2 | Android 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 |
2014-05-13 | 2012-06-04 |
4.91 x 2.55 x 0.48 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
5.01 ounces | 4.70 ounces |
Black and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
-- | Polycarbonate |
Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
$ 105.00 | $ 110.00 |
Display / Screen | |
4.3 inches | 4.8 inches |
540 x 960 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
-- | Super AMOLED |
256 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
7.8 | 8.2 |
Performance | |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
1 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
8.1 | 8.46 |
Storage | |
4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
3.82 | 6.16 |
Camera | |
5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
-- | f/2.60 aperture |
-- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
-- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
5.5 | 8.47 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
4.7 | 5.6 |
Battery Life | |
1980mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
-- | Wireless Charging |
-- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
3.92 | 4 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
GPS | GPS |
-- | NFC |
Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
FM Radio | -- |
The Galaxy S III has a score of 70.8, which is much better than the Motorola Moto E's overall score of 56.9. Although Galaxy S III is older than Motorola Moto E, it's construction is incredibly thinner and just a little lighter. Both devices in this review use Android OS, but the Galaxy S III has the older 4.1.2 version while Motorola Moto E has Android 4.4.4.
The Galaxy S III features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto E, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of display, a quite larger display and a higher 1280 x 720px resolution. Samsung Galaxy S III counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto E, and although they both have the same number of cores and a 400 megahertz graphics processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S III also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S III takes much better photos and videos than Moto E, because it has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels. The Galaxy S III counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto E, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 64 GB and 12 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S III features a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto E, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity instead of 1980mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S III costs a bit more money than Moto E, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.