Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim
SM-G3812B| Global Score | |
| 56.9 | 60.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2 | Android 4.2 |
| 2014-05-13 | 2014-03-15 |
| 4.91 x 2.55 x 0.48 inches | 5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 105.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 256 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 5.94 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1980mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S3 Slim has a score of 60.4, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto E's overall score of 56.9. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S3 Slim has 4.2 version while Motorola Moto E has Android 4.4.4. Galaxy S3 Slim's design is a little lighter and extremely thinner than the Motorola Moto E, although they were released only 2 months apart.
Moto E and Galaxy S3 Slim both have really similar screens, because although the Galaxy S3 Slim has a just a little worse pixels density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 960 x 540 pixels, it also counts with a quite larger display. Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto E, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 32 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim also has 4 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy S3 Slim's processor is just as good as the processing unit in Motorola Moto E, because although the Galaxy S3 Slim has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have the same RAM memory amount, it also counts with a larger number of 1200 megahertz cores. The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim captures clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Moto E. Both have a back facing camera with a 5 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy S3 Slim features a bit better battery lifetime than Moto E, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy S3 Slim is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.