Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-06-26 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.10 x 3.05 x 0.38 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 8920 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is better than the Motorola Moto E4 Plus's 67.6 overall score. Google Pixel 3a's body is newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola Moto E4 Plus. Google Pixel 3a features a much better looking screen than Moto E4 Plus, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2220 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a much higher pixel density.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto E4 Plus, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Google Pixel 3a has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto E4 Plus, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola Moto E4 Plus counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB. Motorola Moto E4 Plus counts with a much longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Google Pixel 3a costs a little more money than Motorola Moto E4 Plus, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.