Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.5 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.0 |
| 2017-06-22 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.69 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 8920 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.8 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a bit better than the Moto E4, having a 71.5 score against 66.5. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a lighter and a bit thinner cellphone than the Moto E4. Galaxy S III Cricket has a sharper screen than Moto E4, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1280 x 720px, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy S III Cricket has just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto E4, because although it has less CPU cores , and they both have a 2 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Galaxy S III Cricket has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto E4, although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures, they both have the same video frame rates, the same (Full HD) video quality and a same resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Moto E4, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds 64 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. Moto E4 counts with a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 2800mAh battery size instead of 2100mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy S III Cricket is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.