Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2017-06-22 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.69 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 8920 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a global score of 79.5, which is much better than Moto E4's score of 66.5. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy S7 is older and a bit heavier than the Moto E4, it's design is still thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto E4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S7 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a lot better display than Moto E4, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution, a much greater screen pixels density and a little bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy S7 captures better photos and videos than Moto E4, because it has a much larger aperture for better low light photos and video, a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy S7 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto E4, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 200 GB. The Galaxy S7 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Moto E4, because it has a 7 percent greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S7 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.