Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-10-11 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.14 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto E40's global score of 71.8. IPhone X features a much more vibrant display than Moto E40, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of screen and a much better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels.
Apple iPhone X features a more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and less cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The iPhone X takes slightly better videos and photos than Moto E40, because although it has a back camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and video.
The iPhone X features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Moto E40, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Moto E40 counts with a really longer battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.