Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-10-11 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.24 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS is much better than the Motorola Moto E40, having an 84.2 score against 71.8. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a greater performance than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has less processing cores (but faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher pixel quantity per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels. The iPhone XS shoots a bit better videos and photos than Moto E40, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
The Apple iPhone XS's storage for applications and games is just as good as Motorola Moto E40's one, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity. Moto E40 has a much longer battery life than iPhone XS, because it has an 88 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.