Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-10-11 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.33 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is a lot better than Motorola Moto E40, getting an 89 score against 71.8. Google Pixel 5 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto E40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel 5 features a better looking display than Moto E40, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a lot higher pixel quantity per inch of display.
Google Pixel 5 captures much better photos and videos than Moto E40, because although it has a much lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light situations. The Google Pixel 5 features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto E40, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto E40 counts with better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.