Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-10-11 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is much better than Motorola Moto E40's score of 71.8. The LG V35 ThinQ features an incredibly better screen than Moto E40, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a lot better pixel quantity per inch of screen.
LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto E40, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto E40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ shoots clearer photos and videos than Moto E40, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low light photography and video. Moto E40 has a much longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.