Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-10-11 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a lot better than Motorola Moto E40, getting a overall score of 87.1 against 71.8. LG Velvet features a little better processing power than Moto E40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM. LG Velvet features a more vivid display than Motorola Moto E40, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2460px resolution, a better number of pixels per inch of screen and a bit bigger display.
The LG Velvet counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto E40, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG Velvet counts with a very superior camera than Moto E40, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the LG Velvet also has a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
Moto E40 counts with longer battery life than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.