Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-10-11 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| -- | 10.02 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is better than Moto E40, with an 80.8 score against 71.8. Both phones we are comparing come with the same Android 11 OS, so they should count with the same operating system features. The Nokia XR20 has a bit better CPU than Moto E40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia XR20 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Nokia XR20 features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto E40, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little larger display. Nokia XR20 captures much better photos and videos than Moto E40, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the Nokia XR20 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Nokia XR20 has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Moto E40, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Moto E40 has a bit better battery performance than Nokia XR20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4630mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.