Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-10-11 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a score of 79.4, which is better than Motorola Moto E40's global score of 71.8. These devices have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a more recent 14 version and Motorola Moto E40 has Android 11 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features and performance improvements.
The Galaxy A35 5G features a sharper screen than Moto E40, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a quite bigger screen and a better pixel density. The Moto E40 features a much better performing processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A35 5G features a much better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto E40, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a battery life that's just as good as the battery duration in Moto E40. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G takes much better photos and videos than Moto E40, because it has a back facing camera with a better 50 MP resolution and a larger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.