Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-10-11 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than the Moto E40's overall score of 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a better screen than Moto E40, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a greater pixels number in each screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto E40, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 has a little faster processing unit than Moto E40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A52 features a lot better camera than Moto E40, because it has a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos. Moto E40 counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A52, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.