Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-10-11 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than the Moto E40, having a score of 91.3 against 71.8. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Moto E40 has Android 11 version, offering some extra features. The Galaxy A52 5G has a little faster processing unit than Moto E40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto E40, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a much better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto E40, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G shoots much better videos and photos than Moto E40, because it has a way better resolution back camera and a bigger aperture. The Motorola Moto E40 counts with just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.