Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-10-11 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C5 is slightly better than the Moto E40, getting a global score of 76.4 against 71.8. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy C5 has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version while Moto E40 has Android 11 version. The Galaxy C5 features a brighter display than Moto E40, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better 1080 x 1920 resolution and a lot greater count of pixels per inch of display.
Moto E40 counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy C5. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Motorola Moto E40 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy C5, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs in low light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy C5 has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto E40, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy C5 also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The Moto E40 features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, because it has a 92 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.