Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-10-11 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.74 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Moto E40's overall score of 71.8. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Moto E40 has Android 11 version, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and improved performance.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a better screen than Motorola Moto E40, because it has more pixels per inch of screen, a much better resolution of 1536 x 2152 and a quite larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto E40, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Fold features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto E40, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM memory. The Moto E40 has a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy Fold counts with a better camera than Moto E40, because although it has a back camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.