Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-10-11 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is much better than the Motorola Moto E40's 71.8 overall score. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Motorola Moto E40 has Android 11, so it gives a couple additional features.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better looking display than Motorola Moto E40, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little larger screen and a way higher number of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better processing power than Moto E40, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto E40, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots greater pictures and videos than Moto E40, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos and a much more megapixels back camera.
Moto E40 has just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.