Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-10-11 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is better than the Moto E40's general score of 71.8. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version while Moto E40 has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little faster CPU than Moto E40, because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional GPU.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a much sharper screen than Moto E40, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px. Galaxy Note 3 counts with a slightly better camera than Moto E40, although it has a way lower resolution camera in the back and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos in low-light environments.
Galaxy Note 3 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto E40, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note 3 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 64 GB. The Motorola Moto E40 has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.