Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-10-11 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is much better than the Moto E40, with a global score of 79.3 against 71.8. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version and Moto E40 has Android 11 version. Galaxy Note 5 features a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per inch of display and a much better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The Moto E40 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Moto E40 also has a greater number of cores. The Galaxy Note 5 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photography.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 and Moto E40 both count with incredibly similar storage capacity to install applications and games, they have equal internal memory. Moto E40 counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 67 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.