Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-10-11 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.89 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than Motorola Moto E40, having a global score of 89 against 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a better looking screen than Moto E40, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel amount per inch in the screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Moto E40, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a little better performance than Moto E40, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Moto E40 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy Note10 counts with a superior camera than Moto E40, because although it has a much worse 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way larger aperture for better photos and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.