Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-10-11 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.29 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is way better than Moto E40, with an 86.3 score against 71.8. Galaxy S10e features a more vivid screen than Moto E40, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per screen inch and a way better 1080 x 2280px resolution. The Galaxy S10e features a bit faster processing unit than Moto E40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto E40, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. Moto E40 has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy S10e captures better videos and photos than Moto E40, because although it has a much worse 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a way bigger aperture for better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.