Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-10-11 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.78 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is a lot better than Motorola Moto E40, having a overall score of 94.8 against 71.8. Both devices in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has a newer 13 version while Motorola Moto E40 has Android 11, so it gives you some nice extra features.
Galaxy S20 has a much better screen than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better number of pixels per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Galaxy S20 counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Moto E40, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto E40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has 8 GB more RAM. The Moto E40 has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Galaxy S20 takes much better photographs and videos than Moto E40, because although it has a camera in the back with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.