Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-10-11 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE is a lot better than the Moto E40, with a global score of 90.8 against 71.8. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto E40, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S20 FE also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a sharper screen than Moto E40, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a higher pixel density and a lot higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Galaxy S20 FE has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto E40, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Motorola Moto E40 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a much better camera than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has a back camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better images and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.