Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-10-11 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.4 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport is a bit better than Motorola Moto E40, having a score of 77.8 against 71.8. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S5 Sport has a newer 4.4.2 version and Motorola Moto E40 has Android 11 version, so it provides you some additional features and some performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much better pixels quantity per inch in the display. Motorola Moto E40 counts with a bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto E40, because although it has 4 less cores and 2 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU. Moto E40 has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 79 percent more battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport captures a bit better pictures and videos than Moto E40, although it has a much lower 16 mega pixels resolution camera and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.