Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-10-11 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.36 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is better than Motorola Moto E40's 71.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a lot better screen than Moto E40, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a lot greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy S7 counts with a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 200 GB. Samsung Galaxy S7 features a little better performance than Motorola Moto E40, although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), they both have 4 GB of RAM memory.
Moto E40 has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Galaxy S7 has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has a camera with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.