Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-10-11 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge is slightly better than the Moto E40, having a 78.1 score against 71.8. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version while Moto E40 has Android 11 version, so it gives some additional features. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto E40, although it has an inferior number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a much better display than Moto E40, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less MP resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto E40, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 200 GB. The Moto E40 has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.