Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-10-11 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.47 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 is better than Moto E40, having an 81.7 score against 71.8. Galaxy S8 features a much more vibrant display than Moto E40, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and much more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy S8 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto E40, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S8 also has a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 features a little better performance than Motorola Moto E40. They have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount. Moto E40 features a really longer battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy S8 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Moto E40, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.