Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-10-11 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is better than the Motorola Moto E40, with a global score of 83.3 against 71.8. Galaxy S9 has a lot better looking screen than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a much higher pixel amount per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto E40, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S9 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 400 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a bit superior CPU than Moto E40. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy S9 features a superior camera than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has a much lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments. Moto E40 has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S9, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.