Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-10-11 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| -- | 9.03 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is much better than Moto E40's 71.8 global score. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Moto E40 has Android 11 version, so it offers a lot of extra features and increased performance.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a way better looking screen than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher pixel count per screen inch and a much higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto E40. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better storage for applications and games than Moto E40, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Moto E40 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
The Motorola Moto E40 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video, it also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.