Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-10-11 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 9.24 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than the Moto E40, having an 85.6 score against 71.8. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding OS features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a sharper display than Motorola Moto E40, because it has a little bigger screen, a way greater number of pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better 1080 x 2636 resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto E40, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto E40, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Moto E40 has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Moto E40 features a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos or video in low light environments, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.