Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-10-11 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the Moto E40, with a 92.3 score against 71.8. Both phones we are comparing have the same Android 11 OS. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a better performing processing unit than Moto E40, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto E40, because it has a quite larger display, a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better storage to install applications and games than Moto E40, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola Moto E40 has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a better camera than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has a camera with much less MP, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.