Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-10-11 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 9.95 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than Moto E40, getting a 94.6 score against 71.8. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a superior CPU than Moto E40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a more vivid display than Moto E40, because it has a larger screen, a lot better 1768 x 2208 resolution and a higher pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Moto E40, because it has more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior camera than Motorola Moto E40, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light images. Moto E40 has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.