Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-10-11 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| -- | 9.56 ounces |
| Carbon Gray and Pink Clay | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc T700 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali G52 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 9.24 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is a lot better than the Moto E40's 71.8 score. Both devices in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better processing unit than Moto E40, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a more vivid display than Moto E40, because it has a better pixel density, a larger screen and a lot higher 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution. Moto E40 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto E40, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto E40 counts with a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.