Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.77 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Ocean blue and Steel black | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 293 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6739 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8100 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto E6 Play's overall score of 66.2. The Google Pixel is a older, just a bit heavier and a bit thicker phone than the Motorola Moto E6 Play. Google Pixel counts with a bit better processing unit than Moto E6 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel features a better looking display than Moto E6 Play, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better pixel amount per inch of screen and a much higher 1080 x 1920 resolution. Google Pixel captures much clearer photographs and videos than Moto E6 Play, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse 12.3 MP resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited situations.
The Google Pixel counts with a better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto E6 Play, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Moto E6 Play counts with a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has an 8% larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel is also cheap compared to the other phone, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.