Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2014-06-23 |
| 5.77 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Ocean blue and Steel black | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 293 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6739 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8100 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.81 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 Sport is better than the Moto E6 Play, with a 77.8 score against 66.2. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S5 Sport has older 4.4.2 version while Moto E6 Play has Android 9.0 Pie. Despite being the best in this comparison, it must be noted that it's also an extremely older, a little thicker and heavier cellphone.
The Galaxy S5 Sport has a better CPU than Moto E6 Play, and although they both have a 2 GB RAM memory and a Quad-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S5 Sport also has a GPU. The Galaxy S5 Sport features a much more vibrant screen than Moto E6 Play, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1920 x 1080 resolution and a greater pixel density.
Galaxy S5 Sport features a lot better camera than Motorola Moto E6 Play, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S5 Sport also has a camera with a higher resolution. The Motorola Moto E6 Play has a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 32 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB.
The Moto E6 Play features just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S5 Sport is also the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.