Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is much better than the Moto E6 Plus, with an 88.1 score against 73.4. Despite of the fact Apple iPhone X is older and somewhat heavier than the Moto E6 Plus, it's design is still somewhat thinner. IPhone X counts with a lot better looking display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a way higher count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Apple iPhone X has a superior performance than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The iPhone X has a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto E6 Plus counts with a bit superior battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity. IPhone X features a much better camera than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture, a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.