Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 282 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is much better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, with an 82 score against 73.4. Despite of the fact Apple iPhone XR is older and notably heavier than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, it's construction is still just a bit thinner. The iPhone XR has a better display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a same size display, the iPhone XR also has a bit higher 828 x 1792 pixels resolution and a bit better display pixel density.
Moto E6 Plus counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone XR, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto E6 Plus also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The iPhone XR has a better hardware performance than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory and less CPU cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Apple iPhone XR features a superior camera than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality, a larger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
IPhone XR and Motorola Moto E6 Plus both count with very similar battery performance, although the iPhone XR has 2942mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.