Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, with an 80 score against 73.4. Although the Google Pixel 3 is older than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus, it's construction is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner. Google Pixel 3 features a sharper screen than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a lot better screen density.
Moto E6 Plus counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto E6 Plus also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 3 features a little better performance than Motorola Moto E6 Plus. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a back facing camera with less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger camera sensor taking better quality photos, a lot higher video definition and a larger diafragm aperture. Motorola Moto E6 Plus features a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.