Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL is just a bit better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, getting a global score of 80.7 against 73.4. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is a little bit thinner than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, although it is heavier and was released around 11 months before. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a little faster processor than Moto E6 Plus. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a better looking display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a lot better 1440 x 2960 resolution, a little bigger display and a way better screen density. Motorola Moto E6 Plus counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto E6 Plus also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 3 XL features just a bit better camera than Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality photos, a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger aperture. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Moto E6 Plus, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.