Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is better than Motorola Moto E6 Plus's 73.4 general score. Google Pixel 4a is a newer cellphone, and it is also a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Motorola Moto E6 Plus. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a has an older 11 version while Motorola Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Google Pixel 4a has a little faster CPU than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Google Pixel 4a takes a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations, a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Moto E6 Plus has a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4a has just a bit longer battery duration than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 3140mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.