Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-05 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Moto E6 Plus, with an 87.5 score against 73.4. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version and Moto E6 Plus has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is newer and a little bit thinner than the Moto E6 Plus's, although it is also somewhat heavier.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit better processor than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a sharper display than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a quite bigger display, a better pixel count per inch of screen and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a superior camera than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a back camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality, a lot better video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures.
Motorola Moto E6 Plus features a greater storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with superior battery performance than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because it has a 3885mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.